Law Review International Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Open Source Online Publication Edited by the Union of Jurists of Romania and Universul Juridic Publishing House e-ISSN 2246-9435
  • Summary
  • trimite
  • Scientific Life

TO VACCINATE OR NOT TO VACCINATE. BETWEEN MORAL AND CRIMINAL BOUNDARIES

Laura Stanila

 

Abstract

In the current social context, the issue of children's vaccination is a hot topic that has divided

both public opinion and medical professionals into two belligerent camps that are fighting an endless

war. The issue of vaccination can be approached from a multiple perspective but, by virtue of our

specialization, we have proposed an objective approach that starts with morality and ends with the

identification of legal boundaries, both in terms of the state's right to impose the vaccination of

children, as well as the right of parents to refuse to execute such an obligation. Can we talk about a

right and a correlated legal obligation in terms of child vaccination? What would be the rationale for

editing imperative rules imposing such a task that can have consequences in terms of physical

development, health of children and even their life? The act of criminalizing human behaviour must

respect the desiderata of specific social peril level, necessity and proportionality. Is the penal

intervention of the State on the issue of sanctioning the parents' refusal to vaccinate their children in

accordance with these desiderata? Here are just a few of the ideas that we propose to discuss in the

present study, which aims not to provide terse solutions, but to invite to an open, impartial and

balanced dialogue.

DOWNLOAD FULL ARTICLE pdf