Law Review International Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Online Semiannually Publication published by Union of Jurists of Romania and Universul Juridic Publishing House e-ISSN 2246-9435
  • Summary
  • trimite
  • Scientific Life

NEW TENDENCIES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT- COMPLEXITY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE LIABILITY AREA

Ioana-Cristina VORONIUC

 The subject of the complexity of public administration in the liability area is not chosen with the

exigency to elucidate all the theoretical and practical problems that it can raise, but in order to draw a
clear picture of this institution of administrative law. Nowadays, administration appears as a
component of public space, understood as the space of manifestation of general interests and of
specific mechanisms of their assurance. Similar to all others, public administration can be wrong as
well1. And, again, similar to all others, it can and must be held liable for its mistakes. The authors of
administrative law argue that administrative liability is a form of judicial liability that is trained
whenever the rules of administrative law are violated, by committing an illicit act, generally called
administrative misconduct. Considering the administrative illicit, the doctrine distinguishes three
forms of administrative liability, as follows: the administrative illicit itself, contravention illicit and
the illicit that causes material and moral damages.2 At the basis of the organization and functioning
of the public administration, and therefore at the basis of any fact that may cause damage to
individuals, there is a number of administrative acts which gives complexity to the administration,
especially through the identification of the person who has to respond for this damages. Therefore, we
propose to perform an analysis using qualitative methods in order to discover situations in which the
administration is responsible for its illicit acts.

DOWNLOAD FULL ARTICLE pdf