- Scientific Life
COMMON LAW SUPREME COURTS. A COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Abstract
The biggest part of a Supreme Court’s activity is oriented to interpreting statutes and
regulations generated by the state.
In the common law countries we have a small ammount of time to solve the great disputes of
our time.
The modern statutory law has a negative effect for the common law.
In time, together with the separation of some former states from the United Kingdom,
constitutional changes enforced in these countries determined a gradual separation from the UK’s
judicial system.
Begining with the introduction of the Statute of Westminster in 1931, Australia, Canada, New
Zealand, the Republic of Ireland and South Africa acquired legislative powers equal to Britain.
This gave the possibility to these countries to make and enforce their own laws.
This has determined the creation of hybrid systems.
These judicial institutions do not follow the model of the UK system..
Volume X, Issue 2, July-Decembre, posted at 14th of Decembre 2020
Summary
Doctrină: autori români şi străini
Multinational Federalism And Devolution
European Union Law
The Impact Of Brexit On A Series Of European Union Institutional Actors
International Law
Improving And Strengthening The Effectiveness Of The Institutional Capacity Of The Judicial System
Legal theory
The Rather Ambiguous Notion Of Justice Utilised By The European States
Cătălin Constantinescu-Mărunţel
UE Law and Comparative Law
Does lawrence v. Texas Provide Constitutional Support For Same-Sex Marriage?
The influence of human rights on law
The Right To Happiness Of Citizens And The Improvement Of The Quality Of Urban Life
The Fundamental Right To Education And Religious Freedom
Migration and the law
Immigration And European Solidarity