Law Review International Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Open Source Online Publication Edited by the Union of Jurists of Romania and Universul Juridic Publishing House e-ISSN 2246-9435
  • Summary
  • trimite
  • Scientific Life

BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS AS TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF PARENTAL AUTHORITY AFTER DIVORCE

Silviu Gabriel BARBU

Vasile COMAN

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine whether changes in the legislation on the exercise of parental authority brought positive changes in the lives of children whose parents have divorced. The methods used, i.e. comparison and observation, support the scientific approach in order to draw conclusions on the achievement of the ultimate aim of both legislative changes and study, respectively ensuring the best interests of the child. The rule of joint exercise of parental authority for children after the parents' divorce was introduced in the Romanian legal system at the time of the entry into force of the new Civil Code, respectively in 2011, taking also into account the fact that this rule applies in many other states of the European Union. The best interests of the minor require maintaining the child in a balanced family environment, in the presence of both parents, since the risk of breaking the child's spiritual balance is very high along with his or her giving to one of the two parents. Unfortunately, in most cases where the divorce or separation of parents occurs, the access of the nonresident parent to his/her own child becomes difficult to achieve, in which case it is useful to organize a program of personal relations meant to ensure the continuity of the nonresident parent's presence in the child's life. At this moment it is required the experience of the judge, who, taking into account all the aspects specific to each case, to find the best solution for ensuring the respect of the best interests of the child. The exercise of child joint custody may be beneficial for the child, sometimes not, depending on the attitude of each parent, and the judge will have to choose the best solution for each child, each case being different from the other case. And the parents should be advised and trained by specialized personnel so as to take upon themselves learnedly the new situations that they will face during the joint exercise of parental authority, in order to achieve the best interest of the child.

DOWNLOAD FULL ARTICLE pdf

Volume X, special issue II, December 2019, posted at 23th of December 2019

COPERTA-LAWW_1_1_1_2_2_1_2_1.jpg

Summary

Review

Download Volume X, special issue II

 

European Union Law

THE LISBON TREATY AND THE RISKS OF NONCOORDINATION OF ECONOMIC POLICIES IN THE E.U.

Grigore SILASI

Ion M. ANGHEL

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE ROLE OF JURISPRUDENCE AS A SOURCE OF LAW IN ROMANIAN LAW AND IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW

Mihai BĂDESCU

BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS ON THE INSTITUTION OF PENALTY IN THE CONSTITUTIONS OF EU MEMBER STATES

Silviu Gabriel BARBU

Vasile COMAN

THE DISCIPLINARY OFFENCES OF INCOMPATIBILITY AND CONFLICT OF INTERESTS REGARDING PUBLIC OFFICIALS, AS PROVIDED FOR BY THE LEGISLATION OF ROMANIA, ARE OF AN CRIMINAL NATURE UNDER ARTICLE 6, PARAGRAPH 1 ECHR

Tudor CHIUARIU

CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY AND EUROPEAN MEMBERSHIP

Ioniţa COCHINŢU

Cristina TITIRIŞCĂ

THE IMPACT OF THE CURRENT INTERNATIONAL LAW CRISIS ON THE RIGHT TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Titus Corlătean

LEGAL LIMITS OF THE EXERCISE OF THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Nicoleta DIACONU

CONSUMERS PROTECTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SANCTIONING DOUBLE QUALITY STANDARD OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Raluca DINU

EUROPEAN COMMONWEALTH ARMY – CHALLENGE FOR A PROPER EU REGULATION

Carmen Adriana Domocoş

“DISCRIMINATION BY ASSOCIATION” - BETWEEN JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSECRATION AT EUROPEAN LEVEL AND LEGISLATIVE DESIRE IN ROMANIA. SOME CONSIDERATIONS

Constanţa MĂTUŞESCU

THE LEGALITY OF THE APPLICATION OF SUPPLEMENTARY AND ACCESSORY PUNISHMENTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Alexandru POROF

BREXIT AND THE BACKSTOP SOLUTION ON NORTHERN IRELAND

Maria-Cristina SOLACOLU

THE INTERNATIONAL AREA OF THE SUBMARINE TERRITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION INTEREST ON THE EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION OF THEIR RESOURCES

Laura Magdalena TROCAN

 

UE Law and Comparative Law

IN DUBIO PRO REO - MYTH OR REALITY

Denisa BARBU

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM NUCLEAR TRANSPORT

Florin Octavian BARBU

INSTRUMENTS FOR BETTER REGULATION. A COMPARISON OF THE REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (RIA) LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN ROMANIA AND IN FRANCE

Ionuţ-Bogdan BERCEANU

THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF CLUSTERS IN EUROPE. GERMAN MODEL VERSUS ROMANIAN MODEL

Eduard CĂLINOIU

MEASURING THE HARMONIZATION DISTANCE WITHIN THE LEGAL SPACE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AS A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE

Gheorghe BOCŞAN

INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS – LEGISLATIVE CHANGES MADE IN THE ROMANIAN LEGISLATION, THROUGH LAW NO. 151/2019, RELATED TO THE EUROPEAN LEGISLATION AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONVENTIONS THAT PROTECT THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS

Mădălina BOTINĂ

CURRENT CHALLENGES OF THE LAWYER PROFESSION

Alexandru-Aurelian CHIRIŢĂ

RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS AT EUROPEAN UNION LEVEL AND THEIR PROTECTION BY THE PEOPLE'S ADVOCATE

Denis-Roxana GAVRILĂ

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS REGARDING THE IMMOVABLE GOODS PUBLICITY AND THE LAND BOOK OF THE STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Marilena MARIN

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN ETHICAL CHARTER ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN JUDICIAL SYSTEMS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT

Irina MOROIANU ZLATESCU

Petru Emanuel ZLATESCU